博物馆中的艺术应该怎样处理？

讨论问题

1.艺术应该被允许故意挑衅来引发讨论吗？即便有些人感到受伤？
A museum displays a painting that many people find offensive. Would you leave it up or remove it? Why?
2.政治涂鸦应该被认为是艺术还是破坏行为？
Should art be allowed to deliberately provoke to start discussions - even if some feel hurt?
3.如果一部剧 critically 描绘一种宗教，仍然应该允许上演吗？
Should political graffiti be considered art or vandalism?
4.如果一件艺术作品可能会促进仇恨或暴力，你会禁止它吗？
If a play critically portrays a religion, should it still be allowed to be performed?
5.你觉得审查艺术和通过艺术伤害人，哪个更糟糕？
Would you ban an artwork if it could promote hatred or violence?
6.一位艺术家在展览中使用的真实动物尸体 - 艺术还是动物残忍？
What is worse: censoring art or hurting people with art?
7.国家应该资助那些非常有争议的艺术吗？
An artist uses real animal bodies for an exhibition - art or animal cruelty?
8.当社交媒体删除一件艺术作品时，那是审查还是对用户的保护？
Should the state fund art that is very controversial?
9.在你的祖国，有没有了解这些艺术作品被禁止或毁坏的例子？你对此有什么看法？
When social media deletes an artwork, is that censorship or protection of users?

艺术自由 (yìshù zìyóu) - freedom of art

审查 (shěnchá) - censorship

挑衅 (tiǎoxìn) - to provoke

禁忌 (jìnjì) - taboo

侮辱 (wǔrǔ) - to insult/offend

表达自由 (biǎodá zìyóu) - freedom of expression

审查 (shěnchá) - to censor

责任 (zérèn) - responsibility

挑衅 (tiǎoxìn) - provocation

社会 (shèhuì) - society

艺术不应当被禁止，哪怕它会冒犯某些人。

Art should not be banned, even if it offends some people.

我不会禁止这件艺术作品，尽管它可能是争议性的。

I wouldn’t ban the artwork, even if it’s controversial.

应该保护艺术，即使它会挑衅。

Art should be protected, even if it provokes.

我能理解某些人感到冒犯。

I could understand if some people feel offended.